Category: Sports

  • A European watches Major League Baseball

    I see a shiny grassy green diamond, some guys in uniform. One guy on a patch of dirt in the middle throws a ball, and another guy tries to hit it with a stick. If he hits it he wins, if he doesn’t: the other guy wins. It looks like most sports.
    On second glance however, I realize things are not as clear. The guy with the stick — I guess it’s called a bat — seems to be alone against a team. The rest of his team is looking on. Is that fair? Even a soccer penalty — a mostly rare event — it’s still one against one. And how often can he try to hit the ball and how often can this other guy throw it? This is not clear. And what happens after he hits it? And also, what’s an inning? And how many are there? And are there any other sports where they wear hats?

    And it’s not just the hats though. Belts too. Which athletes wear belts? Really.
    Both teams wear collarless uniforms that look like they haven’t changed in a 100 years, which must be intentional. Some wear long pants, others wear knee socks. Either way, the uniforms are buttoned up and either striped or clear. But always neatly tucked in. Except for the guy trying to catch the ball — behind the guy with the bat — he has his own thing going on.

    And then there is this oversized strange looking leather glove. It makes the players look like crabs who lost a claw. But every player wears one like it’s perfectly normal. The glove is mostly used to catch balls, but it also doubles as an accessory to share secrets with teammates that you want to keep from the other team, whose players must all be prodigious lip readers.

    So everyone wears a glove. Except the guy with a bat. A bat that’s either made of wood or metal. Okay, so let’s see, if you have the bat you get three attempts to try and hit the ball? If you hit it correctly, you have to run to a first designated stop — or a base — and if you make it to this first base without your ball being caught or you ball arriving there before you — because someone picked it up and threw it there — you’re safe. Three more bases for a point. If you hit it really hard you might try and run to two, or even three bases in one go. But this is hard. Only if you hit it out of the park, you get to go past all bases and collect a point. That’s called a homerun. But mostly you try to make it to first base, and you wait for your teammate to try and hit the ball. If he does, you get a chance to run to second base (or more). Unless of course a ball is caught or hitters haven’t hit the ball for a combined number of three times, then teams switch sides.

    Pitchers — as the guys that throw the ball are called — seem to center themselves by straightening their hat — a lot — so that their cap is perfectly perpendicular to their faces. And they like to fondle the ball between their fingers while either specifically looking at it or distinctively not. Then they do a little bit more hat straightening before curling up by pulling their knee to their chest, channeling all their power into their throw to make the ball fly around 90 mph between a small rectangle box that is only visible on TV and not to the players. And they do this again and again and again. He has to throw the ball three times correctly between the rectangle — without being it being hit — for the hitter to be out. If he throws it four times outside the box, the hitter is free to walk to first base.

    Hitters also seem to try to get in a meditative state of mind. There are quite a few mannerisms and straight out ticks they perform while standing at the plate. They touch the middle of the plate, swing the bat an exact numbers of times, pull the fingers of their gloves — different gloves — an even number of times. Adjusting, centering, focussing. If you look closely some guys have stains on their right collarbone or shoulder, it’s where the bat touches as they twist and twirl it while waiting for the ball to arrive. It seems that wooden bats are tarred up, for grip, maybe? It’s not as much a physical as it is game about focus and wits. Nonetheless you have to throw the ball really hard, and hit it really hard. It is a multidimensional game.

    Players all look very serious and focused. There is no flopping or cheating, everybody knows the rules and umpires are on top of things. And maybe it’s this aspect that I like most. It’s a fair game.

    It quickly becomes clear that this a game of variables. Lots and lots of variables. And watching a baseball game must be a supremely different experience from playing the game. Watching the game I am constantly assessing stats, making small calculations, holding variables in my head. There are so many intangibles to keep track of, your head needs to clear out the rest of whatever it is working on. Watching baseball is almost meditative. For the guys on the field however, the only focus can be the next pitch.

    I learn that an inning has two parts — a top and a bottom — and a pitcher has to try and strike out hitters three times for a team to change sides, this constitutes an inning. As I learn this the numbers on the screen start to make a little bit more sense, it’s as if I am slowly let in on a secret. A very old and unchanged secret.

    A secret that can be endlessly explored and excavated further. There is no shortage of variables to do so. So an RBI is a Round Batted In, that seems important. And I am glad the announcers explain what the 7th inning stretch is. This sport is drenched in tradition and statistics, and if you want you can drown in it. Not only are there 120 years of history to dive in to, even with such a long history the sport is still evolving and historic events occur in this day and age.

    Baseball is played all over the US: little league, high school, college, minor league and more. But Major League Baseball is of course where the best of the best compete. There are 30 teams in the Major League Baseball. Which doesn’t seem excessive for a country as big as the US. But teams play 162 games in a regular season. Please read the last sentence again, this is not a typo. This adds up to 2430 baseball games in one MLB season! You might call that excessive and very on-brand for the US. So the number of games and stats to obsess over are dazzling. And maybe it’s because of these numbers, but there is something about this sport. Because special things tend happen or are — statistically speaking — bound to happen. And they do. All of the time.

    And so much so that you might even call this sport romantic. This makes complete sense.

    A scene from Moneyball.

  • String Theory – David Foster Wallace

    If you read this blog, you know DFW is one of my favorite writers. I even named my book app, in part, after him. So I could be short about String Theory — it’s a absolute pure delight to read — but, of course, I won’t.

    String Theory – David Foster Wallace (2016) – 150 pages

    String Theory is a collection of 5 DFW essays about tennis. It mostly covers 90s era tennis — Sampras and Agassi — but it closes with 2006 Federer. With DFW’s untimely death in 2008 I find it rather pleasing that by attending the 2006 Wimbledon final, Wallace got to witness, and write about the phenomenon that Federer is. And writing this in 2020, it is even more remarkable that Federer is still playing and competing with the best. Think about that for a second will you.

    That said, his piece on Federer is not the best in this collection. But with Wallace that doesn’t mean it’s bad, because for any other writer such an essay would still be the summit of their writing career.

    Though it seems with Federer that Wallace was, understandably, genuinely awestruck and smitten in such a way that he finds it hard to describe what makes Federer so special. And that probably says more about Federer’s remarkable talent than it does about Wallace’s.

    But it is not just that what sets this essay apart from the others for me, but it is that there is less of Wallace himself in this specific piece. His surprised, bemused and bewildered observations of sometimes unrelated random events or encounters, sprinkled trough his essays, either in footnotes or the main body, are what make his writing so enjoyable. You can find this in most essays, but just a little bit less in the Federer one.

    Take his complete letdown by the bland biography of famous tennis player Tracy Austin. I find it hilarious because it bothers him so much. Even though that (hilarity) was not the goal.
    Because, mind you: in the end, even from such a dull an uninspiring sport biography, Wallace manages to ask valid questions about genius and talent and let’s you know the premise was not to be agitated and write amusingly about that, but to ask questions.

    The essay about Michael Joyce might as well be the greatest thing ever written about tennis (or dare I say, sports in general?). It’s a complex and nuanced, highly technical, hyper personal but still general analysis of what constitutes greatness. He makes you see things with different eyes, while he is learning to see it for himself. Just amazing.

    The lack of this personal observations with the Federer essay are a breeding ground for questions. Was this deliberate? Does this mean he was bored with this style? Was it a style? Questions you can endlessly debate.

    Fact is never has their been a greater collection of stories about the game of tennis than what you’ll find in String Theory.

  • Thomas Dekker: The Descent (Mijn Gevecht) – Thijs Zonneveld

    I finished this book in one sitting. Partly because Zonneveld has a pleasant writing style. But also because the rather recent story of a hugely talented and (very) young cyclist who early on in his career got involved with dope and raced towards destruction is fascinating.

    Thomas Dekker: The Descent (Mijn Gevecht) – Thijs Zonneveld (2016) – 220 pages

    It’s the (auto)biography of Thomas Dekker but it is just as much the biography of the cycling world in the early 2000s. And this world, as we now know, was rotten to the core. This book helped uncover parts of it when it came out in 2016. And many more books about this subject have come out since and around that time.

    The book is telling and doesn’t hold back, for anything of anyone. Even Dekker himself doesn’t come across as a particular likeable character. Arrogant, cocky, egotistical and self-destructive to a fault. A very bright star who burned out VERY quickly.

    He only did one Tour de France and his actual relevant career was only a few short years. The book came out three years ago, and even this year’s Tour de France will have riders older than Dekker is at the moment. So there is a sense of what could have been.

    One important takeaway is the notion that using dope is a gradual (non-conscious) thing. Driven by ego and desire to win. But even more important is the notion that there is no such thing as a casual doper. You either dope or you don’t.

    As a cycling enthusiast it’s not necessarily what you want to read. But it is what it is.

  • The Fall (De Val) – Matthias M.R. Declercq

    Matthias M.R. Declercq pulled of two remarkable things. Not only did he manage to find this extraordinary story about friendship, ambition and sacrifice, he was also able to write it down in exceptional fashion.

    De Val – Matthias M.R. Declercq (2017) – 296 paginas

    The events described in ‘The Fall’ (‘De Val’) are real, but the book is not necessarily a biography. The story revolves around a group of five Belgian riders (flandriens) who are pretty well known in the cycling circuit. Some are even minor celebrities. Their lives and events — and especially the fall — are pretty well known and in some cases were front page news. As a writer you could easily overlook these stories because they were already so heavily documented.

    But Declercq shows to have a keen eye for the story behind a story, and he was able to look past known facts and look for a deeper, collective connection between these five riders. And from their humble shared beginnings, Declercq takes the reader on a journey for each individual rider.

    He does so with finesse. There is a dignified distance in his writing style (like a reporter) and this strikes the right tone of being an interested witness rather than a thrill seeker (the latter being the fate of many sport books of recent years). By doing so we get to hear the human perspective behind the stories. All these riders have lives, parents, wives, children and they sacrifice a lot. Which might be easy to forget when watching the Giro.

    The fact that the often dramatic and heroic sport of cycling is a central subject, of course helps the book, but it is mostly Declercqs’ writing that make this book stand out. I love cycling and I love good books by good writers. This book has both.

  • Rising NBA stars

    The 2016/2017 NBA season has been a lot of fun so far. Just like the previous season. All kinds of records are being broken. It seems the game is changing. Or maybe it’s because we just keep track of everything now. Either way it’s much more interesting to follow the NBA than it was a decade ago.

    We all know the global stars like Curry, Westbrook, Durant, LeBron and Harden. They’ve already made a mark in previous years, and continue to do so. But I’d like to point out some players that caught my eye this season, and who might be the future of the NBA.

    So more or less in order, here we go.

    Devin Booker

    This 20 year old, second year NBA player is quietly leading his team, the Phoenix Suns in points, as of this week. Very young, but this kid is really quickly developing in to what might be a franchise player for the Suns. They need one. Here he is dropping 39 against the Spurs, one of the best defensive teams around, just last week.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAA5r6_lY2M

    Kemba Walker

    Player for the Hornets, because of that he is not getting the attention he deserves. Has a few years under his belt already, after an illustrious college career, but is still improving. The thing that doesn’t need improving, because it can’t be improved is his step back jumper.

    Isaiah Thomas

    This is an exciting player, he is not related but he was named after the famous Pistons player Isiah Thomas (yes, it’s spelled different). So it almost seems he was destined for the NBA. He is breaking the rules. Current shortest player in the NBA and drafted dead last in 2011. But also currently second in the NBA in point per game! And shortest player to record a triple-double in a game and shortest player to score 50 points in a game.
    Also he is mr. 4th quarter. Breaking franchise and NBA records in points made in the 4th quarter. Here he is scoring 52 points this season, including 29 (!) in the fourth quarter:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeqFKVZYcZA

    Andrew Wiggins & Karl Anthony Towns

    Ok this next one is a double-header, because they play for the same team. It almost isn’t fair, but Minnesota has a lot going for them. One is 21 year old Karl-Anthony Towns aka KAT. Who is an absolute beast in his own right. The other is 21 year old Andrew Wiggins. As versatile a player as they come. Just see for yourself.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijLNKTtp0ig

    Joel Embiid

    After being drafted in 2014, Joel Embiid had to wait 2 years to make his NBA debut because of broken bone in his foot. So this is his first year. And because of that he has restricted playing time, but man does this guy show promise. Big, athletic, can run the floor. And hungry! After some rough years, the 76-ers have a great future to look ahead to. Embiid is joined by Jahlil Okafor, to make up one of the most talented front courts in years! And let’s not forget they also have last year #1 draft pick Ben Simmons. Who, just like Embiid, is sitting out his first season due to an injury. With all this going for them they even might be title contenders in a few years. They certainly have the talent. Here is Embiid scoring 26 points in just as many minutes. Just trust the process.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkT4DtN37zk

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Ok, I already knew Giannis before this season, how could you not. But he is the player I am most excited about. Just 22, but already in his 4th NBA season. Some people are born to play basketball. He is one of them. He probably has the most untapped potential in the entire NBA now. Crazy athletic, has the width and reach of a center but plays the guard position! Nicknamed the Greek Freak. It is scary to watch this guys’ ability. Has the potential to change the game. His name is unpronounceable (I have to google it everytime) but nonetheless he is still selected to the all star team this year, and rightly so.